ACLU Opposes Constitutionally Flawed Death Penalty Legislation, Proposed Changes Would Violate Eighth Amendment’s Protections (3/30/2006)
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: media@dcaclu.orgWASHINGTON - The American Civil Liberties Union signaled its opposition today
to the Death Penalty Reform Act of 2006 (DPRA), which is being considered in the
House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security. This
bill would violate the Eighth Amendment by allowing for the execution of persons
with mental retardation, and by making virtually every crime resulting in death
and involving a firearm eligible for the death penalty.
"We urge lawmakers to oppose this dangerous legislation because it violates
several fundamental constitutional principles," said Caroline Fredrickson,
Director of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office. "Study after study,
including one released by the Department of Justice in 2000, has documented
racial, ethic, and economic disparity in the application of the death penalty.
This legislation does nothing to address the problem, but may actually worsen it
by allowing capital punishment to be applied to people with mental
retardation."
The definition of "mental retardation" outlined in the Death Penalty Reform
Act is without any basis in medical science and goes against the generally
accepted definition of mental retardation established by physicians and other
mental-health experts. In addition, the DPRA allows jurors, rather than medical
professionals, to determine whether a person is mentally retarded. The majority
of state legislatures considering that question have adopted an approach that
resolves the issue before the start of the trial.
The ACLU noted that if a person is not deemed to be mentally retarded before
the start of the trial, it will be very difficult for jurors to separate
themselves from the evidence and make an objective determination about a
defendant’s mental state.
According to the Death Penalty Information Center, 123 innocent people have
been released from death row since 1973. The increasing numbers of innocent
people released from death row illustrate the fallibility of this system. In
2004, a University of Michigan study identified 199 murder exonerations since
1989, 73 of them in capital cases. The same study found that death row inmates
represent a quarter of 1% of the prison population but 22% of the exonerated.
"Some safeguards are in place to protect people from unfairly receiving the
death penalty, but these statistics indicate that we still have a long way to
go," said Jesselyn McCurdy, Legislative Counsel to the ACLU. "It would be a
mistake to expand the application of the death penalty rather than invest
resources in ensuring its fair and just application. While we understand the
need for true reform to the federal death penalty system, we cannot support this
legislation in its current form, as it places too many innocent people at
risk."
To read the ACLU’s letter on HR 5040, please go to:
http://www.aclu.org/capital/general/24798leg20060329.html
|