|
|
Home :
Drug Policy
:
Health-Based Solutions
ACLU Defends Sponsor of Marijuana Initiative from Attack by Santa Barbara City Council (5/8/2007)
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: media@aclu.org
Participation in Political Process Must Not Become a Casualty of the “War on
Drugs,” Says ACLU
SANTA BARBARA, CA – Citing California’s ban on
strategic lawsuits against public participation (“SLAPP”), the American Civil
Liberties Union today moved to dismiss a legal challenge brought by the Santa
Barbara City Council seeking to thwart a new law, enacted through voter
initiative, that directs police to focus resources on violent and serious crime
by making marijuana use the lowest law enforcement priority. The Council’s
lawsuit was brought against the initiative’s sponsor based solely on her
participation in the political process.
“Individuals must be free
to join in the democratic process without fear of being dragged into court,”
said Allen Hopper, an attorney with the ACLU Drug Law Reform Project. “If
allowed to proceed, the Council’s lawsuit will have a chilling effect on the
political activity of all Californians.”
The Council is seeking to
overturn Measure P, a ballot initiative that was passed on November 7, 2007 by
over 65 percent of the electorate. The initiative was sponsored by Heather
Poet, who is the lone target of the Council’s
litigation.
California’s anti-SLAPP statute, which is intended to
protect individuals from litigation based on participation in the political
process, shields Poet from the Council’s lawsuit, according to the
ACLU.
Today’s legal filing by the ACLU argues that initiative
proponents, like Poet, must be assured they will not risk the time and expense
of drawn-out litigation solely because they support the passage of a law, such
as Measure P, that is later challenged in court.
Designed to
free law enforcement resources to better address violent and serious crime,
Measure P makes “investigations, citations, arrests, property seizures, and
prosecutions for adult marijuana offenses, where the marijuana was intended for
adult personal use, the city of Santa Barbara’s lowest law enforcement
priority.” The measure does not de-prioritize marijuana offenses related
to public use or driving under the influence.
In 2005, the city of
Santa Barbara suffered over 570 violent crimes and 1,500 serious property
crimes, according to federal government statistics.
Santa Barbara
is not alone in enacting its lowest law enforcement priority ordinance.
Since 2000, at least 11 cities and counties, including seven in California, have
enacted legislation treating certain marijuana offenses as a low or the lowest
law enforcement priority.
The full text of the Measure P
initiative is available online at: www.taxandregulate.org/sb06/Fulltext.htm
The
ACLU’s motion calling for a dismissal of the Council’s lawsuit is available at:
www.aclu.org/drugpolicy/decrim/29627lgl20070507.html
|
|
|
