American Civil Liberties Union

Prisoners' Rights:
The ACLU's National Prison Project is the only national litigation program on behalf of prisoners. Since 1972, the NPP has represented more than 100,000 men, women and children. The NPP continues to fight unconstitutional conditions and the "lock 'em up" mentality that prevails in the legislatures. Learn more about our project and take action to protect the rights guaranteed to all Americans.


Watchlist Counter: Who's a Terrorist Now?

Freedom Files - Season 2
Ideological Exclusion

ACLU NewsfeedsACLU News Feed
ACLU Blog
ACLU Podcasts

Prisoner Rights : General : Legal Documents

Complaints Filed by Roderick Johnson (02/26/2004)

ACLU National Prison Project 2002-2003 Litigation Docket (12/29/2003)

ACLU's Ninth Circuit amicus brief in Auer v. Donat, et al (05/16/2003)
The National Prison Project's recently filed amicus brief in the Ninth Circuit, arguing that technical pleading rules (in this case, a requirement that the prisoner seek in his grievance every form of relief he eventually wishes to seek in his lawsuit) should not be read into PLRA's exhaustion requirement.

Amador v. Andrews (04/28/2003)

Halloran v. Armstrong et. al., Complaint for Damages (04/25/2003)

Gulash v. Armstrong et. al., Complaint for Damages (04/25/2003)

Farrell v. Harper (04/25/2003)

Wiseman v. Armstrong et. al., Complaint (04/25/2003)

ACLU Petition in Baily v. WV Division of Corrections (04/09/2003)

ACLU National Prison Project 2001-2002 Litigation Docket (03/28/2003)

Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment in Skinner v. Uphoff (10/24/2002)

ACLU Complaint in Johnson v. Johnson (04/18/2002)
Legal complaint filed on behalf of Roderick Johnson, a gay prisoner repeatedly raped by Texas prison gangs and denied protection by prison officials.

Johnson v. Johnson - Complaint (04/17/2002)
In April, 2002, the NPP filed suit, seeking damages and injunctive relief on behalf of Roderick Johnson, a young, gay African American who alleges that, from September 2000 to April 2002, he was subjected to a system of gang-run sexual slavery. The complaint alleges that prison officials violated Mr. Johnson’s Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment by deliberately failing to protect him, and that they denied him equal protection of the laws based on his race and sexual orientation. This case reached the court of appeals in the Fifth Circuit where the court held that Mr. Johnson could pursue a claim for discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. Following remand to the district court, the case was tried in September and October 2005, where we suffered a heart-breaking loss when the jury rejected Johnson’s claims. Nonetheless, the case focused national attention on Texas’ failure to protect prisoners from rape.

Click to show/hide issues list
Your Local ACLUcongressional scorecardmultimediaforumspublicationssupport usstorecontact