Congress Expected to Pass Health Privacy Protections (4/24/2008)
ACLU Urges
President to Sign 1st Civil Rights Bill of 21st
Century FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact:
(202) 675-2312 or media@dcaclu.org WASHINGTON DC - After more than a
decade of debates, hearings and votes, Congress is expected to pass legislation
referred to as the first civil rights bill of the 21st century that
is a critical step toward securing civil liberties in the emerging field of
medical technology. The ACLU urges President Bush to
live by his words in support of health privacy protections and sign the Genetic
Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2007 – known as GINA, into
law. GINA would provide a national
framework to direct companies and states on how to protect information acquired
by genetic tests and protect against genetic discrimination. It will also
regulate appropriate use of such information so employers and health insurers do
not misuse it in a discriminatory way. “I hope this president has the
compassion and the foresight to see that enactment of this bill is critical for
all American families. As information about individuals’ genetic predispositions
to develop medical conditions becomes more available, GINA will enable us to
keep information about our bodies to ourselves,” said Caroline Fredrickson,
director of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office. “Decisions about how to
handle genetic predispositions are intensely personal ones,” Fredrickson
continued. “Discrimination based on a person’s genetic information, just like
that based on race or disability, should not be
tolerated.” “Doctors have
testified that genetic tests reveal the most intimate and personal
health-related information that exists about any individual,” said ACLU Senior
Legislative Counsel Timothy Sparapani. “While all medical information should be
treated as private, genetic information is uniquely sensitive because it reveals
potential, but not certain, health concerns, such as a family tendency to have
breast cancer.” Sparapani explained that genetic
information may allow for early diagnosis and treatment. It can ensure that
people can make informed decisions and retain maximum control over their health.
This information can also be misused to deny individuals health care insurance
and employment. Some cases of discrimination have already been documented. For
example, one woman from Kentucky was denied health care coverage for
her children because they carry a gene for alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AAT),
even though her sons are merely carriers and will never develop the
condition. Fredrickson added, “This law is
needed because the occurrence of such cases is certain to increase as genetic
testing becomes more common in the near future. Fear of such discrimination will
also have a chilling effect, causing individuals to refuse potentially
life-saving testing due to fear of how the results will be used by employers,
insurers, or the government.” “While the emerging field of
medical technology brings great promise to help people prevent disease, it also
has the potential to enable employers to discriminate, as some already
apparently have,” said Sparapani. “The president needs to enact GINA now before
Americans are unfairly denied access to health care or face workplace
discrimination.” In addition to health care
benefits, employment discrimination and insurance misuse are very real concerns.
Genetic information can be used by employers to weed out job candidates who are
more likely to become an economic burden due to
illness. The Council for Responsible
Genetics has reported on hundreds of genetic discrimination cases, including one
involving “a social worker who lost her job within a week of mentioning that her
mother had died of Huntington's disease and that she had a 50 percent chance of
developing it.” As more health information reaches
the hands of employers and insurers through electronic data systems, individuals
with genetic susceptibility to a debilitating disease could find that they,
their children, and even their grandchildren are regarded as unemployable or
uninsurable. To view the ACLU’s
letter to the Senate urging support of S. 358, go
to: http://www.aclu.org/privacy/gen/34993leg20080423.html * *
*
|