ACLU In Court Today In Lawsuit Against Boeing Subsidiary That Aided CIA “Torture Flights” (2/5/2008)
FOR IMMEDIATE
RELEASE CONTACT: media@aclu.org;
(212) 549-2666 Group Opposes
Government’s Misuse Of “State Secrets” Claim In Attempt
To Throw Out Case
SAN
JOSE, CA - The American Civil Liberties
Union will argue in federal court today
for the continuation of its case against Boeing subsidiary Jeppesen Dataplan,
Inc. for the company’s role in the CIA’s “extraordinary rendition” program. The
ACLU is opposing the government’s attempt to throw out the case by misusing the
“state secrets” privilege in an effort to avoid legal scrutiny of the unlawful
and shameful program.
"'Extraordinary rendition' is no
secret. By the government's reasoning, the CIA's torture and detention program
can be discussed anywhere in the world, except in an American courtroom," said
Ben Wizner, staff attorney with the ACLU, who will be arguing the case today.
"The CIA is once again abusing the claim of 'state secrets' to avoid judicial
oversight and accountability."
Today’s hearing is part of a
lawsuit brought by the ACLU on behalf of five victims of the rendition program
who were kidnapped and secretly transferred to U.S.-run prisons or foreign
intelligence agencies overseas where they were subjected to harsh interrogation
techniques and torture. The lawsuit charges that Jeppesen knowingly aided the
program by providing flight planning and logistical support services for
aircraft and crews used by the CIA to transport the victims.
After the lawsuit was filed, the
U.S. government intervened to seek its
dismissal, asserting the “state secrets” privilege and contending that further
litigation of the case would be harmful to national security. However,
information needed to pursue the lawsuit, including details about the
"extraordinary rendition" program itself, is already in the public
domain.
It has been 50 years since the
United States Supreme Court last reviewed the use of the “state secrets”
privilege. The privilege has historically been used to exclude discrete pieces
of evidence from trials, but in recent years the government has asserted the
claim with increasing regularity in order to block entire lawsuits and justify
withholding information from the public about rendition, illegal wiretapping,
torture, and other breaches of U.S. and international law.
The Supreme Court recently refused
to review the “state secrets” privilege in a lawsuit brought by ACLU client
Khaled El-Masri, an innocent German citizen who was kidnapped while on vacation
with his family and subjected to detention, interrogation, and torture at a
secret CIA prison in Afghanistan and released without ever being
charged with a crime.
Jeppesen’s involvement in the
"extraordinary rendition" program has been publicly confirmed by extensive
evidence and testimony. In a December 2007 sworn declaration filed with the
court in the ACLU’s case, Sean Belcher, a former Jeppesen employee, reported
that a senior Jeppesen official, Bob Overby, told new employees at a company
meeting that Jeppesen did “all the 'extraordinary rendition' flights,” referring
to them as “torture flights” and talking about how profitable the rendition
flights were.
“American companies should not be
given a free pass to profit from unlawful and disgraceful programs like
'extraordinary rendition,'” said Steven Watt, staff attorney with the ACLU Human
Rights Program. “Jeppesen should be held accountable for knowingly helping to
deliver rendition victims to countries where we all know torture and other
abuses regularly occur. The victims of rendition deserve their day in
court.”
The lawsuit was brought on behalf
of rendition victims Binyam Mohamed, Abou Elkassim Britel, Ahmed Agiza, Mohamed
Farag Ahmad Bashmilah, and Bisher Al-Rawi.
Wizner will argue the case today in
front of federal Judge James Ware of the Northern District of
California.
In addition to Wizner and Watt,
attorneys in the lawsuit are Steven Shapiro and Jameel Jaffer of the national
ACLU, Ann Brick of the ACLU of Northern California, Paul Hoffman of the law firm
Schonbrun DeSimone Seplow Harris & Hoffman LLP, and Hope Metcalf of the Yale
Law School Lowenstein Clinic. In addition, Margaret L. Satterthwaite of the
International Human Rights Clinic of New York University School of Law
represents Bashmilah, and Clive Stafford-Smith and Zachary Katznelson represent
Mohamed.
Documents related to the lawsuit,
including press releases, legal documents, and background information, are
available online at: www.aclu.org/safefree/torture/rendition.html
|