Community Resolution for Rochester, NY (2/2/2006)
Approved by: Rochester City Council
[ COPY of Letter to US Senators Charles Schumer and
Hillary Clinton ]
We are writing to express our deep concern, as elected
officials representing the 219,000 people of the City of Rochester, and as
fellow Americans, about the possible re-authorization of the USA Patriot
Act.
As you know, on February 3rd , sixteen surveillance provisions of
the Act are set to expire. There is justifiable concern about significant
infringement on civil liberties contained in these post -9/11 surveillance and
information sharing procedures. It is very disturbing that the Department of
Justice has failed to adequately answer questions presented by the Judiciary
Committee about how frequently it has utilized the numerous increased
surveillance and search powers that have been extended to the FBI. The expanded
use of the secret FISA court further confounds Congressional ability to provide
critical checks and balances on supposedly terror related investigations. The
lowered standards for property searches and pen register, secret records
searches, roving wire taps, and a blurring of the line between criminal
investigations and foreign intelligence erode the essence of democracy, chilling
First Amendment rights and weakening the Fourth Amendment.
History has
shown us time and again that unbridled Executive powers have the capacity to
devolve into, at best, paranoid surveillance of our own citizens, and at worst,
a means to maintain power and muffle dissension. Under either scenario we
experience great pressure on our freedom of speech and freedom of association.
Democracy cannot work without a people emboldened to comment upon, criticize,
and partake in peaceful action against their government.
When the USA
Patriot Act was first enacted in 2001, Congress had the wisdom and foresight to
add sunset provisions to particularly intrusive elements of the legislation. As
you know, the 9/11 Commission recommended that the burden of proof for showing
Congress that the Act should be renewed should lie with President Bush.
Specifically, the Commission stated that the President should demonstrate how
each power materially enhances security and that there is adequate supervision
of the powers to ensure that civil liberties are protected. We do not believe
these recommendations have been heeded by the President and his Justice
Department.
Given the paucity of information from the Justice Department
about the implementation of the USA Patriot Act and the President’s inability to
present substantial and accurate evidence as to the critical nature of
re-authorizing the law for the defense of this country against terrorism, we ask
that you vote down those measures that impinge upon the very civil liberties
that make America a world leader.
Title II of the USA Patriot Act
contains numerous surveillance measures that have drastically enlarged FBI
powers with no oversight beyond a secret court whose documents are withheld from
review by Congress. Of particular concern are the following sections, most of
which are expiring:
- Section 203 (b) and (d) relating to the express
document sharing between intelligence agencies and other parts of
government, - Section 206, that allows roving wire taps, - Section 215,
that allows secret and easier access to business records, which could include
library and bookstore records, - Section 218, that lowers the bar for
launching foreign intelligence wiretaps and searches, - Section 213, that
allows “sneak and peak” search warrants, giving authorities the right to search
without immediately notifying the target (No expiration), and - Title VIII,
Section 805, that expands the existing ban on giving material support to
terrorists to include expert advice or assistance, which could lead to guilt by
association (No expiration).
We strongly urge you to include
significantly enhanced Congressional oversight in legislation renewing the USA
Patriot Act, and ask you to ensure that stringent protections are added as a
condition of the Act's passage in order to protect against potentially egregious
infringements on civil liberties.
Sincerely,
[ Signed by all 9
Council Members ]
Lois J. Giess, President Gladys Santiago , Vice
President Carolee A. Conklin, Councilmember Benjamin L. Douglas,
Councilmember John F. Lightfoot, Councilmember Adam C.
McFadden,Councilmember Dana K. Miller,Councilmember William F.
Pritchard,Councilmember Robert J. Stevenson,Councilmember
|