Settlement Reached in Florida Election Lawsuit; Punch Card System Continues to Face Scrutiny Nationwide: Statement of Laughlin McDonald, Director, ACLU Voting Rights Project
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
ATLANTA- The American Civil Liberties Union welcomes the proposed settlement announced today of a class-action lawsuit filed against the state of Florida and seven counties after many minority voters were disfranchised during the controversial 2000 presidential election.
The ACLU joined the lawsuit, NAACP v. Harris, two years ago with civil rights advocates from the NAACP, NAACP Legal Defense Fund, the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, People For the American Way Foundation, the Miami law firm of Williams & Associates and The Advancement Project.
Ensuring voter education standards, the implementation of the ""motor voter"" law, and properly trained poll workers are probably the most important elements of the proposed settlement. These reforms will work to address many the troubling voting issues facing Floridians.
It is important to note, however, that the important issue of ex-felon reenfranchisement was not addressed in the proposed settlement. The ACLU will continue to work with community-based organizations and state legislatures to restore the right to vote to individuals who were once incarcerated.
Today's proposed settlement provides for monitoring to ensure the effective implementation and enforcement of its various provisions. It awaits court approval and it must also be precleared under the Voting Rights Act, so the settlement will not be in place in time for the November elections. We urge state officials to do everything they can do ensure that those elections do not result in any further violations of voting rights. are conducted in a fair and manner.
Some provisions of the settlement include:
- Greater accuracy in the maintenance of voter registration rolls to ensure that eligible voters are not erroneously removed from the voter lists in future elections and restoration of voters who were wrongly removed prior to the 2000 elections.
- Greater statewide uniformity in Election Day procedures by ensuring easy access to countywide voter registration information; availability of alternative voting procedures like provisional ballots and voting by affirmation; and adequate polling place staffing and poll worker training.
- State monitoring and coordination to ensure that state agencies provide required voter registration opportunities and to ensure that the counties carry out state list maintenance programs in a uniform and non-discriminatory manner.
- Allowing the motor vehicles department to automatically change the customer's address for voting purposes, unless the customer specifically does not want to do so. (Several voters were turned away from the polls during the November 2000 election because they thought they had updated their voter registration when they changed their address at the motor vehicles office. Some of these voters also were not offered the opportunity to vote by affirmation at their new precinct as required by federal law.)
- Providing marketing notices in mailings and other customer communications regarding opportunities to register to vote at motor vehicles department offices.
In addition to today's case, attorneys working with the ACLU filed similar lawsuits challenging the use of punch card machines in Georgia, California and Illinois. The theory in these cases was that the selective use by the states of error prone technology violated the equal-treatment-of-voters standard articulated by the Supreme Court in Bush v. Gore.
The case in Georgia proceeded on a faster track than the litigation in Florida and California, and was resolved after the state decertified further use of punch card machines and provided for the implementation of new voting systems by the 2002 general election. In California, further use of punch card machines was declared unconstitutional by the federal court but new equipment will not be in place until the primaries in 2004. In the Illinois case, a court recently rejected the government's motion to dismiss the lawsuit, giving a green light to the ACLU's legal theories.
For more information on these and other voting rights cases related to the 2000 election, go to /votingrights/er/index.html
Learn More About the Issues in This Press Release
-
News & CommentaryDec 2024
Voting Rights
Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?
The Electoral College meets December 17th to certify the results of the 2024 election, but why? The ACLU breaks down if the process is worth keeping. -
ArizonaNov 2024
Voting Rights
American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. RicherAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. Richer
We sued elections officials in Arizona to extend the mail ballot “cure” deadline after ballot processing delays threatened to disenfranchise thousands of voters without notice. -
Press ReleaseNov 2024
Voting Rights
Civil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights ActCivil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights Act
ORANGE COUNTY, Calif. — On November 7, a New York State Supreme Court trial judge issued an opinion striking down the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA). Today, the Legal Defense Fund, American Civil Liberties Union, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, New York American Civil Liberties Union, and Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law issued the following statement in response to the ruling: “The NYVRA is unquestionably constitutional, and protects the freedom to vote for all New Yorkers by helping to ensure voters are not subjected to discrimination when participating in the political process. “The Nov. 7 decision by a state trial judge is deeply flawed and plainly incorrect. We fully expect the decision to be reversed on appeal. It flies in the face of basic legal principles and constitutes a stunning overreach in striking down the entire law, including provisions that are not at issue in the case. “To put it simply, the NYVRA does not discriminate, it bans discrimination – and in doing so protects New Yorkers’ most fundamental right. “New York is stronger when everyone has an equal opportunity to vote.” -
Press ReleaseNov 2024
Voting Rights
Court Restores Relief to Cobb County Absentee Voters, Ensures Ballots will be CountedCourt Restores Relief to Cobb County Absentee Voters, Ensures Ballots will be Counted
ATLANTA — On Wednesday, the Georgia Supreme Court restored relief for Cobb County voters who requested absentee ballots before the deadline but did not receive them on time due to the county’s failure to mail them promptly. The Court asked the parties to brief whether the case was still relevant, given the fact that the election contests had already been decided. In response, the groups that filed the appeal, the RNC and Republican Party of Georgia, moved to dismiss their appeal. But the American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of Georgia, and Southern Poverty Law Center explained that, regardless of the election results, without an extension of the absentee receipt deadline, the right to vote of their clients and other affected Cobb voters will still be violated. They emphasized that the right to vote is fundamental, and it is not about which candidate wins or loses, but instead about the ability for every eligible individual to cast a ballot that is counted. Following the briefing, the Georgia Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and dissolved its earlier order that had put a hold on the counting of the affected voters’ ballots. Affected voters in Cobb County will have their absentee ballots counted per the initial lower court order. For these voters, ballots that were postmarked by 7 p.m. on November 5 will be counted as long as they are received by 5 p.m. on November 8. “This change means that plaintiffs in the lawsuit, including many first-time voters, will have their voices recorded in this election,” said Andrea Young, executive director of the ACLU of Georgia. “Our fight for democracy will never stop.” “Because of the unreasonable timelines imposed by Georgia’s SB 202, this is not the first time the system has failed absentee voters, nor is it the first time we have had to intervene to remedy these failures. We cannot let this pattern continue.” said Theresa J. Lee, senior staff attorney at the ACLU Voting Rights Project. “At the end of the day, it is not about outcomes, it is about ensuring that anyone who requested a ballot by the deadline has their vote counted. As we celebrate today’s form of justice, we’re also looking ahead to prevent these kinds of unacceptable errors in future elections.” “It should not take lawsuits and post-election rulings to ensure that voters can participate in democracy,” said Poy Winichakul, senior staff attorney for voting rights at the SPLC. “But whatever it takes, we will do. The freedom to vote is the most sacred right we have in America — and we are pleased that right will be honored for our clients and many other Cobb County residents who voted absentee.” The ACLU, ACLU of Georgia, and Southern Poverty Law Center filed an emergency lawsuit on November 1, 2024, to ensure that Cobb County voters had enough time to cast their absentee ballots.