FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: media@aclu.org
ACLU and Others Deeply Concerned About
Public Health Impact
NEW YORK – The American Civil Liberties Union today
expressed deep concern about a U.S. government policy that ties the hands of
public health service providers and those who work with them in the global fight
against AIDS.
“Combating the spread of HIV/AIDS and caring for those
infected with the virus is the global public health challenge of the century,”
said Claudia Flores, an attorney with the ACLU Women’s Rights Project.
“The current U.S. government policy shackles those trying to rise to the
challenge, and prevents them from saving lives.”
In a friend-of-the-court brief filed today, the ACLU and a
host of other advocates lay out the public health impact of restricting funds
for HIV/AIDS prevention and education to organizations that have a policy
“explicitly opposing prostitution.” As a result of this policy,
nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) that provide these services are forced to
choose between accepting U.S. funding and adopting a policy that alienates and
stigmatizes many high-risk communities.
“We all want to reduce the number of people infected and
living with HIV/AIDS,” said Paul Zeitz of the Global AIDS Alliance.
“Restricting or eliminating funding for public health organizations will only
serve to increase the number of those infected and those who die.”
The law that mandates this policy, the “AIDS Leadership
Act,” was intended to address and overcome the HIV/AIDS pandemic. Congress
specifically determined that one of the goals of the law is to “increase the
participation of at-risk populations in programs designed to encourage
behavioral and social change and reduce the stigma associated with
HIV/AIDS.”
The policy is so extreme, the ACLU said, that the NGOs are
forbidden from engaging in any speech or activity that could be perceived as
insufficiently opposed to prostitution. Moreover, they are forced to adopt
an organization-wide policy that restricts them from using their own private
funding to engage in such speech or activities.
The United States, as well as the international community,
has long recognized that it is standard public health practice not to stigmatize
and alienate specific communities who are at high risk for contracting HIV/AIDS.
Denying all funds from the U.S. Agency for International Development to
organizations that do not take the pledge is in direct contradiction to this
long held public health practice, the ACLU said.
In its legal brief, the groups said that requiring NGOs that
work primarily with health and social services to take a political stance
opposing sex work thwarts their ability to approach this community in a
non-judgmental and non-moralistic fashion. Those already infected will be
discouraged from acknowledging their condition and seeking treatment because of
a fear of being shunned or abused. Those in high-risk communities will not
seek out information or medical care or may fail to take precautions that stem
the spread of HIV/AIDS for fear of stigmatization.
“This kind of judgment has no place in the battle against
HIV/AIDS,” said Judy Auerbach, Vice President of Public Policy and Program
Development of amfAR, The American Foundation for AIDS Research.
“Withholding accurate information about HIV prevention, care and treatment --
especially from people with heightened vulnerability to HIV infection -- amounts
to public health malpractice. The vital benefits of HIV/AIDS research
belong to us all.”
The organizations that signed onto today’s brief are: AIDS
Action, American Foundation for AIDS Research, American Humanist Organization,
Center for Health and Gender Equity, Center for Reproductive Rights, Center for
Women Policy Studies, Community HIV/AIDS Mobilization Project, Feminist
Majority, Gay Men's Health Crisis, Global AIDS Alliance, Guttmacher Institute,
Human Rights Center, University of California, Berkeley, Human Rights Watch,
Institute of Human Rights of Emory University, International Planned Parenthood
Federation, Western Hemisphere Region, International Women's Health Coalition,
Physicians for Human Rights, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc.,
Population Action International, Population Council, Religious Consultation on
Population, Reproductive Health and Ethics, and The Sexuality Information and
Education Council of the U.S.
Cooperating attorneys at Covington and Burling co-authored
the brief.
The brief is available online at: http://www.aclu.org/womensrights/gen/21210lgl20051109.html