
Bank of America v. City of Miami
What's at Stake
Whether cities have standing to sue under the Fair Housing Act for the economic impact of discriminatory banking practices.
Stay informed about our latest work in the courts.
By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU's privacy statement.
Summary
The predatory lending practices that led to the housing crisis in 2008 had a disproportionate impact on racial minorities. Those practices also led to increased foreclosures that reduced the tax base of cities like Miami, and increased the need for social services. In an amicus brief filed in the Supreme Court with a coalition of other civil rights groups, the ACLU argues that this economic injury is sufficient to give cities standing to sue under the Fair Housing Act. We also document the long history of housing discrimination, both public and private, and its impact on racial segregation.
After the Supreme Court ruled for Miami on the standing issue, it remanded the case to the Eleventh Circuit on a second issue: whether the banks’ actions had proximately caused the harms experienced by the City. We filed an amicus brief in the 11th Circuit arguing that the Fair Housing Act was drafted broadly to include this kind of harm.
Legal Documents
Press Releases
ACLU Comment on Supreme Court Ruling in Fair Housing Act Banking Case