![V](https://assets.aclu.org/live/uploads/2022/02/voting-rights-issue-image-1.jpg)
League of Women Voters of North Carolina, et al. v. North Carolina
What's at Stake
The American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of North Carolina Legal Foundation, and the Southern Coalition for Social Justice filed a lawsuit challenging North Carolina's voter suppression law the very day it was signed by Gov. Pat McCrory in August 2013. The suit targets provisions of the law that eliminate a week of early voting, end same-day registration, and prohibit "out-of-precinct" voting. It seeks to stop North Carolina from applying these provisions, arguing that they unduly burden the right to vote and discriminate against African-American voters, in violation of the U.S. Constitution's equal protection clause and Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Summary
The lawsuit was filed on behalf of several individual North Carolinians who face substantial hardship under the law, and on behalf of organizations whose efforts to promote voter participation in future elections will be severely hampered if the measure takes effect.
North Carolinians use early voting in vast numbers. During the 2012 election, 2.5 million ballots were cast during the early voting period, representing more than half the total electorate. More than 70 percent of African-American voters utilized early voting during the 2008 and 2012 general elections.
For many voters, the choice is between early voting or not voting at all. Early voting provides flexibility in finding time to vote, and significantly eases the burden of arranging transportation to a voting site. This is particularly critical for low-income voters, who are more likely to have hourly-wage jobs that don’t afford them the time to get to the polls on Election Day or during common work hours. Work, combined with child-care responsibilities, places great demands on voters living in poverty. Poverty in North Carolina is higher among African Americans, meaning a reduction in early voting opportunities will disproportionately impact voters of color.
Eliminating same-day registration and out-of- precinct voting imposes hardship and silences the people’s voice. Until 2014, North Carolinians could register, or update their registration information and vote, in one trip to an early voting site. In both 2008 and 2012, approximately 250,000 people did so. African Americans disproportionately relied on same-day registration in both elections. As for out-of precinct voting, for over a decade voters who cast a ballot in the wrong precinct could still expect to have their votes counted for races such as governor and president. In 2016, the law’s photo ID requirement will become effective, creating another barrier to exercising the right to vote. The law eliminates these opportunities to register, vote and have votes count, effectively disenfranchising countless North Carolinians.
On August 8, 2014 the district court denied plaintiffs application to enjoin these provisions before the 2014 election, but on October 1, 2014, the Fourth Circuit appellate court reversed the ruling. On October 8, 2014 the U.S. Supreme Court temporarily stayed the Fourth Circuit decision. At trial in July 2015, we presented witnesses who spoke of how the law has severely restricted ballot access for the most vulnerable citizens, particularly African-American voters. We are awaiting a decision by the district court judge.
The case, League of Women Voters of North Carolina et al. v. North Carolina, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina.
UPDATE: A federal appeals court struck down North Carolina's restrictive omnibus voting law in a sweeping victory for voting rights. The ruling blocks voter ID and restores preregistration, a week of early voting, same-day registration, and out-of-precinct provisional voting. On August 3, the state filed a motion to stay the appeals court’s reinstatement of photo ID, early voting and pre-registration. The request is pending before the U.S. Supreme Court, and we are awaiting a ruling.
May 15, 2017: The Supreme Court declined to hear the case, marking an ACLU victory for voting rights.
Legal Documents
-
08/31/2016
League of Women Voters of North Carolina, et al. v. North Carolina - Order
Date Filed: 08/31/2016
Affiliate: North Carolina
Download Document-
08/25/2016
League of Women Voters of North Carolina, et al. v. North Carolina - Opposition to State's Application
Date Filed: 08/25/2016
Affiliate: North Carolina
Download Document-
07/29/2016
League of Women Voters of North Carolina, et al. v. North Carolina - Ruling
Date Filed: 07/29/2016
Affiliate: North Carolina
Download Document-
05/19/2016
League of Women Voters of North Carolina, et al. v. North Carolina - Appellants Brief
Date Filed: 05/19/2016
Affiliate: North Carolina
Download Document-
04/26/2016
League of Women Voters of North Carolina, et al. v. North Carolina - Ruling
Date Filed: 04/26/2016
Affiliate: North Carolina
Download Document-
04/26/2016
League of Women Voters of North Carolina, et al. v. North Carolina - Notice of Appeal
Date Filed: 04/26/2016
Affiliate: North Carolina
Download Document-
10/01/2014
League of Women Voters of North Carolina, et al. v. North Carolina - Order Partially Reversing, Partially Affirming District Court Preliminary Injunction Order
Date Filed: 10/01/2014
Affiliate: North Carolina
Download Document-
10/01/2014
League of Women Voters of North Carolina, et al. v. North Carolina - Judgment Order
Date Filed: 10/01/2014
Affiliate: North Carolina
Download Document-
09/19/2014
League of Women Voters of North Carolina, et al. v. North Carolina-Brief of Appellants
Date Filed: 09/19/2014
Affiliate: North Carolina
Download Document-
08/08/2014
League of Women Voters of North Carolina, et al. v. North Carolina-Order Denying Preliminary Injunction and Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
Date Filed: 08/08/2014
Affiliate: North Carolina
Download Document-
05/20/2014
League of Women Voters of North Carolina, et al. v. North Carolina - Preliminary Injunction Motion
Date Filed: 05/20/2014
Affiliate: North Carolina
Download Document-
04/17/2014
League of Women Voters of North Carolina, et al. v. North Carolina-Expert Report, M. Kousser
Date Filed: 04/17/2014
Affiliate: North Carolina
Download Document-
04/17/2014
League of Women Voters of North Carolina, et al. v. North Carolina-Expert Report, P. Gronke
Date Filed: 04/17/2014
Affiliate: North Carolina
Download Document-
04/17/2014
League of Women Voters of North Carolina, et al. v. North Carolina-Expert Report, C. Duncan
Date Filed: 04/17/2014
Affiliate: North Carolina
Download Document-
04/17/2014
League of Women Voters of North Carolina, et al. v. North Carolina-Expert Report, T. Allen
Date Filed: 04/17/2014
Affiliate: North Carolina
Download Document-
03/27/2014
League of Women Voters of North Carolina, et al. v. North Carolina-Order Addressing Motion to Compel
Date Filed: 03/27/2014
Affiliate: North Carolina
Download Document-
08/12/2013
League of Women Voters of North Carolina, et al. v. North Carolina - Complaint
Date Filed: 08/12/2013
Affiliate: North Carolina
Download DocumentPress Releases
Votes Not Counted: Day One of North Carolina’s Voter Suppression Trial
ACLU Comment on Supreme Court Action on North Carolina Voting Law
Federal Appeals Court Blocks North Carolina Voting Restrictions in Time for Midterm Election
Federal Appeals Court Hears Arguments on North Carolina's Restrictive Voting Law
Federal Judge Rejects North Carolina's Request to Avoid Full Trial over Restrictive Voting Law
ACLU, Southern Coalition for Social Justice Ask Federal Court to Put N.C. Voter Suppression Law on Hold for Midterm Election