
LGBTQ Discrimination Cases at the Supreme Court
What's at Stake
In Bostock v. Clayton County, the Supreme Court ruled that anti-LGBTQ discrimination violates the federal law against discrimination in the workplace.
Stay informed about our latest work in the courts.
By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU's privacy statement.
Summary
The Bostock case consisted of three cases that were argued at the same time. The ACLU was counsel in two of the cases:
- R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes v. EEOC (Aimee Stephens)
- Altitude Express v. Zarda (Donald Zarda)
In the third case, Bostock v. Clayton County, Gerald Bostock was represented by private counsel.
Aimee Stephens
Aimee Stephens worked as a funeral director at R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes. When she informed the funeral home’s owner that she is transgender and planned to come to work as the woman she is, the business owner fired her, saying it would be "unacceptable" for her to appear and behave as a woman.
Don Zarda
Donald Zarda, a skydiving instructor, was fired from his job because of his sexual orientation. A federal trial court rejected his discrimination claim, saying that the Civil Rights Act does not protect him from losing his job for being a gay man. Tragically, in October 2014, Zarda died unexpectedly, but the case continues on behalf of his estate.
Gerald Bostock
Gerald Lynn Bostock was fired from his job as a county child welfare services coordinator when his employer learned he is gay. In May 2018, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals refused to reconsider a 1979 decision wrongly excluding sexual orientation discrimination from coverage under Title VII’s ban on sex discrimination, and denied his appeal.
Legal Documents
- 07/03/2019
21 States and DC - 07/03/2019
206 Businesses - 07/03/2019
84 Cities, Counties, and Mayors - 07/03/2019
AFL-CIO - 07/03/2019
Altria Group, Inc. - 07/03/2019
American Bar Association - 07/03/2019
American Medical Association, et al. - 07/03/2019
American Psychological Association - 07/03/2019
Anti-Discrimination Scholars - 07/03/2019
Employment Discrimination Law Scholars - 07/02/2019
Equal Means Equal, et al. - 07/03/2019
Former Solicitors General, et al. - 07/03/2019
Georgia Equality - 07/03/2019
Historians of Sexuality, Gender, and Law - 06/27/2019
Karl Olson - 07/03/2019
Kenneth B. Mehlman, et al. - 07/03/2019
Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. in Support of Aimee Stephens - 07/03/2019
Law and History Scholars - 07/03/2019
Legal Aid Society of New York - 07/03/2019
LGBTQ+ Members of the Legal Profession - 07/03/2019
Linguists - 07/03/2019
Members of Congress - 07/03/2019
Modern Military Association of America - 07/03/2019
Muslim Organizations - 07/03/2019
National Education Association, et al. - 07/03/2019
National LGBT Bar Association, et al. - 07/03/2019
National Women's Law Center, et al. - 07/03/2019
Philosophers - 07/03/2019
Religious Organizations and Faith Leaders - 07/03/2019
SEIU - 07/03/2019
Small Business Organizations - 07/03/2019
Southern Poverty Law Center, et al. - 07/03/2019
Wisconsin Advocacy Organizations - 07/03/2019
Women CEOs and Other C-Suite Executives
Date Filed: 07/03/2019
Court: Amicus Briefs in Support of Employees
Download DocumentPress Releases
Supreme Court Urged Not to Roll Back Workplace Protections for LGBTQ People