
LGBTQ Discrimination Cases at the Supreme Court
What's at Stake
In Bostock v. Clayton County, the Supreme Court ruled that anti-LGBTQ discrimination violates the federal law against discrimination in the workplace.
Stay informed about our latest work in the courts.
By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU's privacy statement.
Summary
The Bostock case consisted of three cases that were argued at the same time. The ACLU was counsel in two of the cases:
- R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes v. EEOC (Aimee Stephens)
- Altitude Express v. Zarda (Donald Zarda)
In the third case, Bostock v. Clayton County, Gerald Bostock was represented by private counsel.
Aimee Stephens
Aimee Stephens worked as a funeral director at R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes. When she informed the funeral home’s owner that she is transgender and planned to come to work as the woman she is, the business owner fired her, saying it would be "unacceptable" for her to appear and behave as a woman.
Don Zarda
Donald Zarda, a skydiving instructor, was fired from his job because of his sexual orientation. A federal trial court rejected his discrimination claim, saying that the Civil Rights Act does not protect him from losing his job for being a gay man. Tragically, in October 2014, Zarda died unexpectedly, but the case continues on behalf of his estate.
Gerald Bostock
Gerald Lynn Bostock was fired from his job as a county child welfare services coordinator when his employer learned he is gay. In May 2018, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals refused to reconsider a 1979 decision wrongly excluding sexual orientation discrimination from coverage under Title VII’s ban on sex discrimination, and denied his appeal.
Legal Documents
- 08/23/2019
15 States - 08/21/2019
Advocates for Faith & Freedom - 08/23/2019
American Public Philosophy Institute - 08/22/2019
Billy Graham Evangelistic Association - 08/25/2019
Business Organizations - 08/20/2019
Center for Arizona Policy - 08/23/2019
Christian Employers Alliance - 08/23/2019
Family Policy Groups - 08/23/2019
David A. Robinson - 08/20/2019
Defend My Privacy - 08/23/2019
Dr. Paul McHugh, M.D. - 08/20/2019
First Liberty Institute - 08/16/2019
Foundation for Moral Law - 08/22/2019
Free Speech Advocates - 08/21/2019
Great Lakes Justice Center - 08/20/2019
H.T. Hackney Company - 08/20/2019
Independent Women's Forum - 08/23/2019
Institute for Faith and Family - 08/23/2019
Judicial Watch - 08/23/2019
Liberty Counsel (Bostock and Zarda) - 08/23/2019
Liberty Counsel (Stephens) - 08/23/2019
Marriage Law Foundation - 08/23/2019
Members of Congress - 08/23/2019
Military Spouses United - 08/23/2019
Muslim American Leaders - 08/23/2019
National Association of Evangelicals - 08/20/2019
National Organization for Marriage - 08/22/2019
New Civil Liberties Alliance - 08/23/2019
Public Advocate of the United States et al. - 08/21/2019
Ryan T Anderson - 08/23/2019
Scholars of Family and Sexuality - 08/23/2019
United States - 08/23/2019
Walt Heyer et al. - 08/20/2019
Women's Liberation Front - 08/22/2019
W. Burlette Carter - 08/23/2019
Women Business Owners and CEOs
Date Filed: 08/21/2019
Court: Amicus Briefs in Support of Employers
Download DocumentPress Releases
Supreme Court Urged Not to Roll Back Workplace Protections for LGBTQ People