
Missouri v. Seibert
What's at Stake
Reviewing conviction obtained through statements originally made "outside” Miranda warning. DECIDED
Stay informed about our latest work in the courts.
By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU's privacy statement.
Summary
The issue in this case is whether the prosecution should be barred from relying on any statements made by a defendant who has been deliberately questioned by the police without Miranda warnings even if the defendant repeats the statements a short time later after warnings are given. The ACLU brief documents the extent to which the practice of questioning suspects "outside Miranda" has now become commonplace. It also argues that exclusion is necessary to deter such deliberate violations of Miranda and to preserve the rule of law.
Legal Documents
- 10/16/2003
ACLU Amicus Brief in Missouri v. Seibert
Press Releases
Two Supreme Court Cases Confront Further Erosion of "Right to Remain Silent"