Gerrymandering
Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP (Congressional Map Challenge)
South Carolina unlawfully assigned voters to congressional districts based on their race and intentionally discriminated against Black voters in violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
Status: Ongoing
View Case
Learn About Gerrymandering
Featured
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2024
![Louisiana](https://assets.aclu.org/live/uploads/2024/03/Depositphotos_466919260_S-600x400.jpg)
Callais v. Landry
Whether the congressional map Louisiana adopted to cure a Voting Rights Act violation in Robinson v. Ardoin is itself unlawful as a gerrymander.
Status: Ongoing
View case
Arkansas
Dec 2023
![Arkansas](https://assets.aclu.org/live/uploads/2023/12/Arkansas-600x400.jpg)
NAACP v. Arkansas Board of Apportionment
This case has two key parts: First, the Arkansas House district map diminishes the voting power of Black voters. Second, both the district court and Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals radically concluded that voters may not sue to protect their voting rights under Section 2, putting the VRA in further jeopardy and contradicting decades of precedent in which impacted voters — particularly Black voters — have challenged racially discriminatory voting laws.
Status: Ongoing
View case
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2022
![Alabama on a map of the United States of America](https://assets.aclu.org/live/uploads/2021/11/Alabama-Redistricting-SocialShare-600x314.jpg)
Allen v. Milligan
Whether Alabama’s congressional districts violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act because they discriminate against Black voters. We succeeded in winning a new map for 2024 elections which, for the first time, has two congressional district that provide Black voters a fair opportunity to elect candidates of their choosing despite multiple attempts by Alabama to stop us at the Supreme Court. Despite this win, Alabama is still defending its discriminatory map, and trial will occur in February 2025 to determine the map for the rest of the decade.
Status: Ongoing
View case
Stay informed about our latest work in the courts.
By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU's privacy statement.
All Cases
25 Gerrymandering Cases
Ohio Supreme Court
Sep 2023
![Ohio](https://assets.aclu.org/live/uploads/2024/05/Depositphotos_445248962_S-600x400.jpg)
League of Women Voters of Ohio v. DeWine (Congressional Challenge)
On November 30, 2021, the ACLU and co-counsel filed a lawsuit in the Ohio Supreme Court on behalf of the League of Women Voters of Ohio (LWVO), A. Philip Randolph Institute of Ohio, and several individuals. The suit challenged Ohio’s newly-drawn congressional map.
Status: Closed (Dismissed)
View case
![Ohio](https://assets.aclu.org/live/uploads/2024/05/Depositphotos_445248962_S-600x400.jpg)
Ohio Supreme Court
Gerrymandering
League of Women Voters of Ohio v. DeWine (Congressional Challenge)
On November 30, 2021, the ACLU and co-counsel filed a lawsuit in the Ohio Supreme Court on behalf of the League of Women Voters of Ohio (LWVO), A. Philip Randolph Institute of Ohio, and several individuals. The suit challenged Ohio’s newly-drawn congressional map.
Sep 2023
Status: Closed (Dismissed)
View case
Utah Supreme Court
Jun 2023
![The back of a demonstrator holding a sign that says "Give Us Fair Districts."](https://assets.aclu.org/live/uploads/2021/12/August_Gerrymandering_FullBleed-600x300.jpg)
Utah State Legislature v. League of Women Voters (Amicus)
This case involves a state constitutional challenge to the Utah Legislature’s 2021 redistricting plan, which was drawn to entrench the majority political party’s power and to discriminate against Utahns whose political expression aligns with an opposition political party. The ACLU and the ACLU of Utah filed an amicus brief in support of the challenge in the Utah Supreme Court, explaining why the redistricting map violates Utahns’ free-expression rights and why courts have the authority to block the map as unconstitutional.
Status: Ongoing
View case
![The back of a demonstrator holding a sign that says "Give Us Fair Districts."](https://assets.aclu.org/live/uploads/2021/12/August_Gerrymandering_FullBleed-600x300.jpg)
Utah Supreme Court
Gerrymandering
Utah State Legislature v. League of Women Voters (Amicus)
This case involves a state constitutional challenge to the Utah Legislature’s 2021 redistricting plan, which was drawn to entrench the majority political party’s power and to discriminate against Utahns whose political expression aligns with an opposition political party. The ACLU and the ACLU of Utah filed an amicus brief in support of the challenge in the Utah Supreme Court, explaining why the redistricting map violates Utahns’ free-expression rights and why courts have the authority to block the map as unconstitutional.
Jun 2023
Status: Ongoing
View case
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2023
![Gerrymandering activists gather on the steps of the Supreme Court as the court prepares to hear the the Benisek v. Lamone case on Wednesday, March 28, 2018.](https://assets.aclu.org/live/uploads/2021/09/Social-Ohio-Redistricting-600x314.jpg)
Huffman v. Neiman
This case asks whether the Elections Clause of the U.S. Constitution bars the Ohio state court from enforcing redistricting requirements in the Ohio constitution that prohibit partisan gerrymandering.
Status: Closed
View case
![Gerrymandering activists gather on the steps of the Supreme Court as the court prepares to hear the the Benisek v. Lamone case on Wednesday, March 28, 2018.](https://assets.aclu.org/live/uploads/2021/09/Social-Ohio-Redistricting-600x314.jpg)
U.S. Supreme Court
Gerrymandering
Huffman v. Neiman
This case asks whether the Elections Clause of the U.S. Constitution bars the Ohio state court from enforcing redistricting requirements in the Ohio constitution that prohibit partisan gerrymandering.
Feb 2023
Status: Closed
View case
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2022
![KS](https://assets.aclu.org/live/uploads/2022/11/ks-600x230.jpg)
Alonzo v. Schwab
Does the Constitution prohibit racial discrimination in redistricting regardless of the size of the group targeted by the state?
Status: Closed
View case
![KS](https://assets.aclu.org/live/uploads/2022/11/ks-600x230.jpg)
U.S. Supreme Court
Gerrymandering
Alonzo v. Schwab
Does the Constitution prohibit racial discrimination in redistricting regardless of the size of the group targeted by the state?
Nov 2022
Status: Closed
View case
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2022
![scotus](https://assets.aclu.org/live/uploads/2022/11/Supreme-Court-2020-Header-Image_0-600x400.jpg)
Moore v. Harper (Amicus)
Can state legislatures draw gerrymandered districts and make other rules for federal elections without any check from state courts applying the rules of their own state constitutions?
Status: Closed (Judgment)
View case
![scotus](https://assets.aclu.org/live/uploads/2022/11/Supreme-Court-2020-Header-Image_0-600x400.jpg)
U.S. Supreme Court
Gerrymandering
Moore v. Harper (Amicus)
Can state legislatures draw gerrymandered districts and make other rules for federal elections without any check from state courts applying the rules of their own state constitutions?
Nov 2022
Status: Closed (Judgment)
View case