1. The proportion of girls caught up in the juvenile justice system is increasing.
In New York
Nationally
2. Girls of color are locked up in disproportionate numbers.
In New York
Nationally
3. Girls experience abuse and neglect when they are confined in juvenile facilities.
In New York
Nationally
4. Incarceration is linked to poverty and other disadvantage.
In New York
Nationally
5. Most incarcerated girls have suffered physical or sexual abuse in their homes prior to being confined, and many suffer from trauma and other mental health problems.
In New York
Nationally
[1] In 2004, 2,104 children were taken into Office of Children and Family Services (OCFS) custody; 392 of these were girls. New York State Office of Children and Family Services, Division of Rehabilitative Services, "Youth in Care: 2004 Annual Report," ii, 2 (Table 2) ("OCFS Annual Report (2004)"). This figure includes children remanded for residential services as well as a relatively small number remanded for non-residential services.
[2] Percentages calculated from OCFS Annual Report (2004), p. 2 (Table 1). OCFS did not release its 2004 Annual Report until 2006, and no further reports have been released to date.
[3] United States Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), "Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report," p. 201 ("OJJDP, ‘2006 National Report'"): http://ojjdp.ncjrs.org/ojstatbb/nr2006/index.html.
[4] OJJDP, "2006 National Report," p. 206.
[5] Kids Count Database.
[6] The OCFS classification is "non-Hispanic African-American."
[7] This figure includes girls categorized as Hispanic African-American, Hispanic-White and Hispanic-Other.
[8] The OCFS classification is " non-Hispanic White."
[9] These figures are calculated from "Table 1: Characteristics of Admissions to Selected OCFS Facilities, 2003-2005," obtained through the New York Freedom of Information Law and on file with HRW and the ACLU.
[10] OCFS, "2004 Annual Report," p. 4.
[11] OJJDP, "2006 National Report," p. 211.
[12] OJJDP, "2006 National Report," p. 211.
[13] OJJDP, "2006 National Report," p. 209.
[14] Riyadh Guidelines, paras. 63, 64; U.N. Rules, rules 66-67. Even the standard applied to adults is very restrictive, permitting physical force only in "self-defense or in cases of attempted escape, or active or passive physical resistance to an order based on law or regulations." United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, U.N. ECOSOC Res. 663C and 2076, adopted July 31, 1957 and May 13, 1977, para. 54(1); American Correctional Association, "Standards for Juvenile Correctional Facilities," 3-JTS-3A-31 (Feb. 2003) ("Use of Force: Written policy, procedure, and practice restrict the use of physical force to instances of justifiable self defense, protection of others, protection of property, and prevention of escapes, and then only as a last resort and in accordance with appropriate statutory authority. In no event is physical force justifiable as punishment. . . "); 9 NYCRR §§ 168.3(a),168.2(b).
[15] Human Rights Watch and the American Civil Liberties Union, Custody and Control: Conditions of Confinement in New York's Juvenile Prisons for Girls , September 2006.
[16] Calculated from Monthly Reports prepared by each girls' facility. For more information, see Human Rights Watch and the American Civil Liberties Union, Custody and Control: Conditions of Confinement in New York's Juvenile Prisons for Girls , September 2006.
[17] OJJDP, "2006 National Report," p. 230.
[18] OJJDP, "2006 National Report," p. 230.
[19] OJJDP, "2106 National Report," p. 231.
[20] Percentage calculated from OCFS Annual Report (2004), p. 6 (Table 2).
[21] See, for example, OJJDP, "2106 National Report," 7 (describing the association between juvenile poverty, family disruption and juvenile crime). An overview of girls' pathways to delinquency is provided in Marty Beyer, "Delinquent Girls: A Developmental Perspective," Kentucky Children's Rights Journal , pp. 9, 17-25 (2001).
[22] Inez Nievez, Associate Deputy Commissioner for Programs and Services for the Division of Rehabilitative Services, in HRW and ACLU meeting with OCFS senior administrators, Albany, New York, April 18, 2006. According to the information made available to HRW and the ACLU, OCFS has not collected information on this feature of the girls in its care since the 1980s. In response to an April 21, 2006 Freedom of Information Law request for "[a]ny and all documents relating to or arising from data collection conducted by any government agency on the rate of past abuse (physical, sexual, or otherwise) experienced by girls, boys, and/or girls and boys in OCFS custody," OCFS responded that it "does not maintain records in the manner you request." Letter from Sandra A. Brown, Assistant Commissioner, Public Affairs, to HRW and the ACLU, June 28, 2006.
[23] OCFS, "2004 Annual Report." This official figure is not disaggregated by gender. This figure may be low, as OCFS does not necessarily perform screening on every child it takes into custody.
[24] Meda Chesney-Lind,The Female Offender: Girls, Women and Crime (Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, 1997), pp. 25-26.
[25] Cathy S. Wisdom and Michael G. Maxfield, "An Update on the ‘Cycle of Violence,'" in Research in Brief , U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice (2001).
[26] National Mental Health Association, "Mental Health and Adolescent Girls in the Justice System," (1999); Nancy Rosenbloom, Legal Aid Society, testimony before the Council of the City of New York, Committee on Women's Issues and Youth Services and Subcommittee on Juvenile Justice, April 18, 2000 ("Legal Aid Society Testimony (2000)"); HRW/ACLU telephone interview with Legal Aid Society attorney, September 28, 2005. Leslie Acoca, "Investing in Girls: A 21st Century Strategy," p. 5. (describing "serious physical health problems" and need for "psychological services" in 88 percent and 53 percent respectively of a sample of "girls in the California juvenile justice system").