ACLU Files Federal Challenge to Partisan Gerrymandering in Ohio
‘Politicians Shamelessly Flouted Will of Voters with Partisan Manipulation of Election Process’
CINCINNATI — The American Civil Liberties Union filed a federal lawsuit today challenging the Ohio U.S. congressional map as unconstitutional partisan gerrymandering. The lawsuit seeks to replace the map with one that accurately reflects the will of voters and complies with the Constitution.
“Politicians have shamelessly and repeatedly flouted the will of voters with their partisan manipulation of the election process,” said Alora Thomas-Lundborg, staff attorney with the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project. “The Ohio map was specifically drawn to create an unfair advantage to one political party — Republicans — but gerrymandering is wrong no matter what party does it. Voters should choose their representatives, not the other way around.”
Ohio’s current congressional map was drawn by state Republicans and the national GOP after the 2010 census. According to the lawsuit, their redistricting operation was based out of a secretly rented hotel room in Columbus, tellingly referred to as “The Bunker” by the Republican operatives and officials who were involved. From there, a redrawn map emerged.
“Ohio’s map was manipulated to create a congressional delegation with a 12-4 Republican advantage — and to lock it in for a decade. And the map has consistently performed exactly as its architects planned,” said Freda Levenson, legal director of the ACLU of Ohio. “The party has only received 50 to 60 percent of the statewide vote in these elections this decade. Their fixed possession of 75 percent of seats regardless of how voters vote is egregious.”
By entrenching the party in power and insulating it from meaningful accountability to the electorate, partisan gerrymandering substantially burdens voters’ fundamental rights, including their First Amendment right to associate for the advancement of political beliefs, to express political views, and to participate in the political process; their First and Fourteenth Amendment right to cast a meaningful vote; and their Fourteenth Amendment right to equal protection and treatment under the law. Partisan gerrymandering also far exceeds the powers left to the states to draw district lines.
The lawsuit, Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute v. Kasich, was filed in U.S. District Court in Cincinnati. Plaintiffs include the Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute, the League of Women Voters of Ohio, and individuals from every congressional district in Ohio. Named defendants include Ohio Gov. John Kasich, Secretary of State Jon Husted, Interim Ohio House Speaker Kirk Schuring, and Senate President Larry Obhof.
Co-counsel are ACLU National, the ACLU of Ohio, and the law firm Covington and Burling.
The complaint is at: https://www.aclu.org/legal-document/ohio-philip-randolph-institute-v-kasich-complaint
Watch the video and read the blog: “Why Ohio’s Congressional Map is Unconstitutional”
More information is at: https://www.aclu.org/cases/ohio-philip-randolph-institute-v-kasich
Voting Rights
Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute v. Smith
Voting Rights
Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute v. Smith
Learn More About the Issues in This Press Release
-
News & CommentaryDec 2024
Voting Rights
Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?
The Electoral College meets December 17th to certify the results of the 2024 election, but why? The ACLU breaks down if the process is worth keeping. -
New York Supreme CourtDec 2024
Voting Rights
New York Communities for Change v. Nassau CountyNew York Communities for Change v. Nassau County
This case in New York state court centers on the landmark John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA) and the New York Municipal Home Rule Law (MHRL). The NYVRA, like several other state voting rights acts enacted in recent years, expands upon the federal Voting Rights Act’s protections against racial vote dilution. The MHRL prohibits racial discrimination and partisan gerrymandering in local-level redistricting. The ACLU’s Voting Rights Project and State Supreme Court Initiative, alongside the New York Civil Liberties Union, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, and Steptoe LLP filed a lawsuit on behalf of voters of color in Nassau County, New York alleging that a redistricting plan implemented in 2023 for Nassau County’s legislative districts dilutes the voting strength of Black, Latino, and Asian residents and is gerrymandered for partisan advantage in violation of the NYVRA and the MHRL. -
ArizonaNov 2024
Voting Rights
American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. RicherAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. Richer
We sued elections officials in Arizona to extend the mail ballot “cure” deadline after ballot processing delays threatened to disenfranchise thousands of voters without notice. -
Press ReleaseNov 2024
Voting Rights
Civil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights ActCivil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights Act
ORANGE COUNTY, Calif. — On November 7, a New York State Supreme Court trial judge issued an opinion striking down the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA). Today, the Legal Defense Fund, American Civil Liberties Union, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, New York American Civil Liberties Union, and Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law issued the following statement in response to the ruling: “The NYVRA is unquestionably constitutional, and protects the freedom to vote for all New Yorkers by helping to ensure voters are not subjected to discrimination when participating in the political process. “The Nov. 7 decision by a state trial judge is deeply flawed and plainly incorrect. We fully expect the decision to be reversed on appeal. It flies in the face of basic legal principles and constitutes a stunning overreach in striking down the entire law, including provisions that are not at issue in the case. “To put it simply, the NYVRA does not discriminate, it bans discrimination – and in doing so protects New Yorkers’ most fundamental right. “New York is stronger when everyone has an equal opportunity to vote.”