ACLU Comment on Arpaio Criminal Contempt Conviction
PHOENIX — A federal court has found former Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio guilty of criminal contempt for willfully violating a 2011 federal court order that required his agency to stop detaining people based solely on suspected civil immigration violations.
The criminal case, which was prosecuted by the Department of Justice, is separate from the long-running civil rights case brought by the American Civil Liberties Union but arose from civil contempt proceedings in that litigation. In the civil rights case, Ortega Melendres v. Arpaio, a federal court previously ruled that Arpaio's office profiled and illegally detained Latinos, violating their constitutional rights. The judge ordered a significant overhaul of the agency’s policing practices, and the civil contempt-of-court proceedings arose after Arpaio and his top deputies repeatedly ignored the court’s orders.
ACLU Deputy Legal Director Cecillia Wang had this reaction to today’s criminal contempt conviction: “This verdict is a vindication for the many victims of Joe Arpaio’s immigration policies, which were unconstitutional to begin with, and were doubly illegal when Arpaio flouted the court’s orders. Joe Arpaio learned his lesson the hard way — no one, not even America’s so-called toughest sheriff, is above the law.”
Stay informed
Sign up to be the first to hear about how to take action.
By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU's privacy statement.
By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU's privacy statement.
Learn More About the Issues in This Press Release
Related Content
- Press ReleaseMay 2025
Immigrants' Rights
Aclu Foia Litigation Reveals Information About Ice Capacity, Contracts In Facilities Nationwide. Explore Press Release.ACLU FOIA Litigation Reveals Information About ICE Capacity, Contracts in Facilities Nationwide
WASHINGTON – New documents obtained by the ACLU this week reveal further details about Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) detention capacity in facilities nationwide. Notably, for the first time ever, ICE directly provided information regarding the total capacity of facilities run by private prison corporation, GEO Group, Inc. (GEO). The records, obtained as a result of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed by the ACLU in September 2024, also reveal specific proposal details regarding the North Lake Detention Facility in Baldwin, MI, and the Rio Grande Processing Center in Laredo, TX. “Communities across the country are being torn apart by the Trump administration’s cruel mass deportation agenda, fueled in part by ICE’s detention machine,” said Eunice Cho, senior staff attorney at the ACLU’s National Prison Project. "For the first time, the government has disclosed the capacity of immigration detention facilities run by GEO, the largest private prison corporation in the U.S. Each detail revealed through our litigation is critical to understanding how this infrastructure – and taxpayer dollars – could be wielded to detain immigrants who contribute to our communities and our economy.” GEO runs 100 facilities globally, with a capacity of approximately 81,000 beds across those facilities. Notably, documents obtained by the ACLU reveal that more than 22,000 beds – over a quarter of GEO’s global capacity – are used for ICE detention facilities in the United States. The documents also reveal that GEO runs 20 facilities under contract with ICE across the country, including in California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Washington. The FOIA documents also revealed details surrounding contracts for the North Lake Detention Facility, a previously vacant facility in rural Michigan that will soon serve as the one of the largest ICE detention hubs in the Midwest. They also revealed further information about GEO’s offer to ICE for more beds at the Rio Grande Processing Center in Laredo, TX, a facility currently used by both ICE and the U.S. Marshals Service. Currently, the Rio Grande facility has a capacity of 1,900 beds, and is contracted to detain up to 672 people for ICE. The FOIA documents are available here: https://www.aclu.org/documents/aclu-foia-documents-revealing-ice-capacity-contracts-with-geo-group-inc-2 - Press ReleaseMay 2025
Free Speech
Immigrants' Rights
Appeals Court Orders Trump Administration To Transfer Rümeysa Öztürk To Vermont. Explore Press Release.Appeals Court Orders Trump Administration to Transfer Rümeysa Öztürk to Vermont
NEW YORK – The Second Circuit Court of Appeals today denied the Trump administration’s attempt to further delay Rümeysa Öztürk’s transfer to Vermont. The appeals court ordered the government to comply with a lower court’s ruling to move Ms. Öztürk from a Louisiana detention center to a facility in Vermont. The government must do so within one week. “No one should be arrested and locked up for their political views. Every day that Rümeysa Öztürk remains in detention is a day too long. We’re grateful the court refused the government’s attempt to keep her isolated from her community and her legal counsel as she pursues her case for release,” said Esha Bhandari, deputy director of the ACLU’s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project. Ms. Öztürk, a former Fulbright scholar and current Tufts University Ph.D. student researching child development, has been held in a Louisiana detention center for six weeks — all in retaliation for co-authoring an op-ed in her student newspaper. On March 25, while Ms. Öztürk was on the phone with her mom, plainclothes Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents surrounded her in Somerville, Massachusetts and arrested her. For nearly 24 hours, Ms. Öztürk’s attorney was unable to locate her as ICE quickly and quietly moved her to three separate locations in three different states — including Vermont — before sending her to Louisiana. “Every day Ms. Öztürk spends in confinement is an affront to the constitution. Her constitutional injury is only compounded by the deplorable conditions she must suffer through. Today, the court rightfully declined to play along with the government’s latest attempt to keep Ms. Öztürk separated from her community and legal counsel. We will continue to advocate for Ms. Öztürk until she is released,” said Mudassar Toppa, staff attorney at CLEAR, a legal non-profit and clinic at CUNY School of Law Since she arrived in Louisiana, Ms. Öztürk has lived in a cramped room with poor ventilation and 23 other women for almost all hours of the day. In new filings in her federal court case in Vermont, she says she has suffered several asthma attacks that have “become progressively harder to recover from” while in detention. Whereas her attacks used to last between 5-15 minutes, they now can last up to 45 minutes. She is regularly exposed to asthma triggers including insect and rodent droppings, and is almost never exposed to fresh air. The court filings also describe difficulty receiving appropriate care in detention, including delays to receive medical care and dismissive comments from medical staff. “Rümeysa has suffered six weeks in crowded confinement without adequate access to medical care and in conditions that doctors say risk exacerbating her asthma attacks. Her detention — over an op-ed she co-authored in her student newspaper — is as cruel as it is unconstitutional,” said Jessie Rossman, legal director, ACLU of Massachusetts. “Today, we moved one step closer to returning Rümeysa to her community and studies in Massachusetts.” A federal judge in Vermont will hold hearings regarding Ms. Öztürk's motion to be released on bail on May 9 and the merits of the habeas petition on May 22. “The government’s efforts to deny Rümeysa access to justice by deploying these gratuitous delay tactics have once again been rightfully blocked by the courts,” said Lia Ernst, legal director, ACLU of Vermont. “Today’s ruling affirms that her swift transfer to Vermont is essential, and we will continue fighting until she is free.” Ms. Öztürk is represented in immigration court by Mahsa Khanbabai and Marty Rosenbluth, and in federal court by Mahsa Khanbabai, the American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of Massachusetts, ACLU of Vermont, CLEAR, and Emery Celli Brinckerhoff Abady Ward & Maazel LLP. For documents and other case information, see here.Court Case: Öztürk v. TrumpAffiliates: Vermont, Massachusetts - Press ReleaseMay 2025
Free Speech
Immigrants' Rights
Federal Judge Rules Against Trump Administration By Keeping Dr. Khan Suri’s Habeas Case In Virginia. Explore Press Release.Federal Judge Rules Against Trump Administration by Keeping Dr. Khan Suri’s Habeas Case in Virginia
ALEXANDRIA, Va. – In a major victory for Georgetown scholar Dr. Badar Khan Suri and a huge blow to the Trump administration, today a federal court ruled that Dr. Suri’s habeas case alleging violations of his constitutional rights may remain in Virginia. Federal immigration agents illegally arrested Dr. Khan Suri on March 17, 2025 in retaliation for his constitutionally-protected speech in support of Palestinian rights and his family’s ties to Gaza, and then secretly transported him to Louisiana and then Texas in an effort to prevent him from accessing the courts. Since then, the Trump administration has detained Dr. Khan Suri in an ICE facility 1,500 miles away from his family, despite the fact that he is a lawful visa holder married to a U.S. citizen. His unlawful arrest and detention are an extreme and unprecedented attack on the First Amendment and part of the Trump administration’s escalation of attacks against students and Palestinian rights advocates. “In just four days, ICE transferred Dr. Khan Suri among five different ICE facilities across three states – while keeping his counsel in the dark about his whereabouts – and he’s not the only one,” said ACLU-VA Legal Director Eden Heilman. “The Trump administration tried to do the same thing to Mr. Khalil, Ms. Ozturk, and Mr. Mahdawi in order to find a court it believed would be friendlier to its unlawful detention of people advocating for Palestinian rights. We are pleased the court saw through the Trump administration’s attempts to manipulate the law, and we won’t stop fighting until Dr. Khan Suri is reunited with his family.” Dr. Khan Suri’s federal court challenge to the constitutionality of his arrest and detention will now proceed in Virginia, where his wife and three young children live. The federal court in Virginia will hear Dr. Khan Suri’s motions to compel his return to Virginia and to be released on bond at a hearing on May 14, 2025. Separately, in Dr. Khan Suri’s immigration case, the immigration court in Texas has scheduled a follow-up hearing for June 3, 2025. “In this important ruling, the court has rightfully rejected the Trump administration’s efforts to spirit Dr. Khan Suri away from Virginia to manufacture jurisdiction in whatever court it pleases,” said Astha Sharma Pokharel, an attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights. “We will now continue fighting for Dr. Khan Suri’s freedom — his freedom to be with his family in Virginia, to continue his studies and work at Georgetown, and to stand in solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza.” In today’s ruling, the court found that the government’s “abnormal and rapid movement [of Dr. Khan Suri] across state lines” demanded an exception to the normal jurisdictional rules for the filing of habeas petitions by a person in government custody in order not to reward the government’s attempt at forum shopping. A federal judge ruled against the Trump administration last month when it found that the court can review former Columbia student Mahmoud Khalil’s First Amendment claims challenging his arrest and detention. Another federal judge ruled against the Trump administration last week when it ordered the release of Columbia student Mohsen Mahdawi on bond. And yet another federal judge ruled against the Trump administration when it ordered Tufts student Rümeysa Öztürk to be transferred back to Vermont from Louisiana. Dr. Khan Suri is challenging his arrest and detention under the First Amendment, the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, and the Administrative Procedure Act, and is represented in his federal lawsuit by the ACLU of Virginia, the Center for Constitutional Rights, the HMA Law Firm, and the Immigrants and Non-Citizens Rights Clinic at the CUNY School of Law. For more information, please see the case page.Affiliate: Virginia - Press ReleaseMay 2025
Immigrants' Rights
Colorado Federal Court Blocks Removals Under Alien Enemies Act . Explore Press Release.Colorado Federal Court Blocks Removals Under Alien Enemies Act
Ruling follows similar one in New York earlier today DENVER — A Colorado federal court has issued a preliminary injunction blocking removals under the Alien Enemies Act (AEA) for people within that court’s judicial district. The ruling follows a similar one from a New York federal court earlier today. The Colorado case is D.B.U. v. Trump. The court ruled the presidential proclamation exceeds the scope of the Alien Enemies Act because there is no “invasion,” “predatory incursion,” or “foreign nation or government” as required under the act. The Colorado ruling stems from a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of Colorado, and the Rocky Mountain Immigrant Advocacy Network. The following is reaction to today’s ruling: “The court properly recognized that the president cannot simply ignore the constraints Congress placed on the use of this extraordinary wartime authority,” said ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt, lead counsel in the case. “The court has again affirmed what we have always known to be true: deporting and disappearing people without notice or due process is cruel, unconscionable, and unlawful,” said Tim Macdonald, ACLU of Colorado legal director. “The federal government cannot misuse the Alien Enemies Act, a two-centuries old law that was passed in 1798 to provide narrow wartime powers and has only been used three times in our country’s history. We will keep fighting to ensure no one else is subjected to this nightmare instigated by the Trump administration. No one, including the federal government, is above the law.” “The federal government has disappeared people. People who lived in our Colorado community are gone, imprisoned in El Salvador. Instead of watching and waiting, our clients took action on behalf of themselves and countless others similarly situated in the Aurora ICE detention facility. Their bravery, the diligent work of our co-counsel at the ACLU, and the team of steadfast advocates at RMIAN worked together to gain protection against this heartless and lawless government action,” said Laura Lunn, director of advocacy and litigation at the Rocky Mountain Immigrant Advocacy Network. The ruling is online here.Court Case: DBU v. TrumpAffiliate: Colorado