Groups Challenge Newly Passed Ohio Congressional Map as Unconstitutional Partisan Gerrymandering
COLUMBUS, Ohio — The ACLU of Ohio, the American Civil Liberties Union, and Covington & Burling LLP filed a lawsuit today challenging Senate Bill 258, which establishes new congressional districts for Ohio, giving Republicans an unconstitutional partisan advantage. This proposal was signed into law by Gov. Mike DeWine on November 20.
The lawsuit was brought on behalf of the League of Women Voters of Ohio, the A. Philip Randolph Institute, and several individuals.
Earlier this month, the Ohio General Assembly voted to enact the map along strict party lines, with nearly all Republicans, but no Democrat, voting in favor. The enacted plan is heavily skewed to favor the Republican Party; it awards Republicans 67%-80% of Ohio’s congressional seats, although the party receives only 55% of Ohioans’ votes. Because this proposal received no support from the minority party, it will only be in place for four years, according to the terms of Article XIX, Section 1, of the Ohio Constitution.
This is the second Ohio redistricting lawsuit filed this year by the ACLU and plaintiffs — the first was brought in September, to challenge the state House and Senate districts, which are also severely gerrymandered. Oral arguments in that case are set for December 8.
“Our elected officials have once again flagrantly violated the will of Ohioans, who have repeatedly voted for fair districts. Judicial intervention is critical to prevent these self-serving officials from perpetuating the terrible tradition of extreme partisan gerrymandering in our state. A core principle of republican government is that the voters should choose their representatives, not the other way around,” noted Freda Levenson, legal director of the ACLU of Ohio. “For the second time in two months, we ask the state’s highest court to enforce the Ohio Constitution, and ensure that Ohio voters are able to have a voice in their government.”
“Here we go again,” added Julie Ebenstein, senior staff attorney with the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project. “Ohio politicians are making another brazen attempt to undermine voters, who amended their state Constitution to prevent gerrymandering. Yet try as they may, politicians do not get to choose their voters — voters get to choose their politicians.”
According to the lawsuit: “The map unduly splits governmental units in the urban and suburban areas of southwestern and northeastern Ohio. In particular, the Enacted Plan splits counties and communities in Hamilton, Cuyahoga, and Summit — splits that are unnecessary for any purpose other than to minimize the efficacy of Democratic votes.”
“The newly adopted congressional map is an affront to the Ohio Constitution and our democracy. Despite demanding reforms at the ballot box in 2018, Ohio voters are facing an even more extreme gerrymander than the congressional districts that they've been forced to live with for the past decade,” noted Jen Miller, executive director of the League of Women Voters of Ohio. “From start to finish, mapmakers shamefully defied voter expectations of having a transparent, bipartisan, and public process that resulted in congressional districts that serve voters — not politicians. Ohioans deserve better.”
“Gerrymandering harms all voters, especially those from minority communities. This map will not accurately reflect the people of Ohio in Congress, not by a long shot,” offered Andre Washington, president of the Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute. “This cycle of endless gerrymandering leads voters to believe nothing will ever change — it deters citizens from wanting to engage in the electoral process. This is our last hope for a fair map.”
“Under the enacted plan the Republicans can anticipate winning 67% to 80% of the congressional seats — even though they are only likely to obtain about 55% of the vote. The Ohio Constitution flatly prohibits that outcome,” added Robert Fram of Covington & Burling LLP.
The case, League of Women Voters of Ohio et al v. Governor DeWine, was filed in the Supreme Court of Ohio.
Voting Rights
League of Women Voters of Ohio v. DeWine (Congressional Challenge)
Voting Rights
League of Women Voters of Ohio v. DeWine (Congressional Challenge)
Learn More About the Issues in This Press Release
-
News & CommentaryDec 2024
Voting Rights
Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?
The Electoral College meets December 17th to certify the results of the 2024 election, but why? The ACLU breaks down if the process is worth keeping. -
ArizonaNov 2024
Voting Rights
American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. RicherAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. Richer
We sued elections officials in Arizona to extend the mail ballot “cure” deadline after ballot processing delays threatened to disenfranchise thousands of voters without notice. -
Press ReleaseNov 2024
Voting Rights
Civil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights ActCivil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights Act
ORANGE COUNTY, Calif. — On November 7, a New York State Supreme Court trial judge issued an opinion striking down the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA). Today, the Legal Defense Fund, American Civil Liberties Union, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, New York American Civil Liberties Union, and Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law issued the following statement in response to the ruling: “The NYVRA is unquestionably constitutional, and protects the freedom to vote for all New Yorkers by helping to ensure voters are not subjected to discrimination when participating in the political process. “The Nov. 7 decision by a state trial judge is deeply flawed and plainly incorrect. We fully expect the decision to be reversed on appeal. It flies in the face of basic legal principles and constitutes a stunning overreach in striking down the entire law, including provisions that are not at issue in the case. “To put it simply, the NYVRA does not discriminate, it bans discrimination – and in doing so protects New Yorkers’ most fundamental right. “New York is stronger when everyone has an equal opportunity to vote.” -
Press ReleaseNov 2024
Voting Rights
Court Restores Relief to Cobb County Absentee Voters, Ensures Ballots will be CountedCourt Restores Relief to Cobb County Absentee Voters, Ensures Ballots will be Counted
ATLANTA — On Wednesday, the Georgia Supreme Court restored relief for Cobb County voters who requested absentee ballots before the deadline but did not receive them on time due to the county’s failure to mail them promptly. The Court asked the parties to brief whether the case was still relevant, given the fact that the election contests had already been decided. In response, the groups that filed the appeal, the RNC and Republican Party of Georgia, moved to dismiss their appeal. But the American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of Georgia, and Southern Poverty Law Center explained that, regardless of the election results, without an extension of the absentee receipt deadline, the right to vote of their clients and other affected Cobb voters will still be violated. They emphasized that the right to vote is fundamental, and it is not about which candidate wins or loses, but instead about the ability for every eligible individual to cast a ballot that is counted. Following the briefing, the Georgia Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and dissolved its earlier order that had put a hold on the counting of the affected voters’ ballots. Affected voters in Cobb County will have their absentee ballots counted per the initial lower court order. For these voters, ballots that were postmarked by 7 p.m. on November 5 will be counted as long as they are received by 5 p.m. on November 8. “This change means that plaintiffs in the lawsuit, including many first-time voters, will have their voices recorded in this election,” said Andrea Young, executive director of the ACLU of Georgia. “Our fight for democracy will never stop.” “Because of the unreasonable timelines imposed by Georgia’s SB 202, this is not the first time the system has failed absentee voters, nor is it the first time we have had to intervene to remedy these failures. We cannot let this pattern continue.” said Theresa J. Lee, senior staff attorney at the ACLU Voting Rights Project. “At the end of the day, it is not about outcomes, it is about ensuring that anyone who requested a ballot by the deadline has their vote counted. As we celebrate today’s form of justice, we’re also looking ahead to prevent these kinds of unacceptable errors in future elections.” “It should not take lawsuits and post-election rulings to ensure that voters can participate in democracy,” said Poy Winichakul, senior staff attorney for voting rights at the SPLC. “But whatever it takes, we will do. The freedom to vote is the most sacred right we have in America — and we are pleased that right will be honored for our clients and many other Cobb County residents who voted absentee.” The ACLU, ACLU of Georgia, and Southern Poverty Law Center filed an emergency lawsuit on November 1, 2024, to ensure that Cobb County voters had enough time to cast their absentee ballots.