Groups Sue Trump EPA Nominee Scott Pruitt for Denying Public Access to Polluter Emails

OKLAHOMA CITY, Okla. — Days before the Senate votes on Scott Pruitt’s nomination to head the Environmental Protection Agency, the American Civil Liberties Union of Oklahoma and the law firm Hall Estill filed a lawsuit alleging that Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt violated the Oklahoma Open Records Act by failing to provide public access to official emails and other documents for more than two years.

The suit, filed on behalf of the Center for Media and Democracy (CMD), asks for an emergency injunction to prevent the Oklahoma attorney general from destroying any documents relevant to the group’s open records requests before his confirmation hearing.

Since 2015, CMD filed seven records requests with Pruitt’s office seeking communications with Koch Industries and other coal, oil, and gas corporations as well as the corporate-funded Republican Attorney General’s Association (RAGA). Pruitt has yet to turn over a single document, despite acknowledging in August 2016 that his office has 3,000 emails and other documents relevant to CMD’s first request in January 2015.

“Attorney General Pruitt had two years to respond to a lawful request for documents from his office. Instead of complying with the law, he has stonewalled public interest groups, the United States Senate, and the American people,” said Ryan Kiesel, executive director of the ACLU of Oklahoma. “Pruitt's refusal to turn over these documents is unreasonable and unjustifiable. The lawsuit we filed today serves notice that when it comes to accountability and transparency, no government official is above the law.”

The Oklahoma Open Records Act states that “the people are vested with the inherent right to know and be fully informed about their government . . . so they may efficiently and intelligently exercise their inherent political power.” The act also mandates that a public body “must provide prompt, reasonable access to its records.”

“Freedom of information is essential to ensure the integrity of our government,” said Brady Henderson, legal director of the ACLU of Oklahoma. “When public officials like Scott Pruitt fail to abide by Open Records Act requirements, it interferes with the people’s ability to do our job holding government accountable. With Pruitt seeking confirmation to become EPA administrator, these public records are essential for the U.S. Senate to do its job too. Public records belong in public view, not hidden for months or years behind closed doors.”

For the past several years, CMD has led an investigation to pull back the curtain on Pruitt’s, and other attorneys general’s, relationships with fossil fuel industry titans, and the advocacy groups they fund.

“Scott Pruitt has withheld access to thousands of emails with businesses or organizations whose activities adversely affect the environment and other records of vital public interest for the past two years,” said Robert Nelon, a leading media and First Amendment lawyer with the firm Hall Estill. “His inaction denies the public 'prompt and reasonable' access to public documents and violates Oklahoma's Open Records Act.”

The lawsuit comes on the heels of a difficult few weeks for Pruitt’s nomination in which research from CMD has demonstrated Pruitt’s repeated pattern of obfuscating ties to deep-pocketed corporate interests.

At his hearing before the Senate Environment and Public Works (EPW) Committee, Pruitt faced a series of questions about his private meetings with major fossil fuel companies while chair of RAGA and fundraising for the Rule of Law Defense Fund. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) concluded his questioning by telling Pruitt his testimony “just doesn’t add up.” Despite failing to respond to any records requests for the past two years, Pruitt told senators last week to file more open records requests with his office to answer 19 outstanding questions from his confirmation hearing.

“Public servants at the EPA spend each day trying to counter corporations’ injection of dangerous chemicals into our air, water, and homes. Despite this, Pruitt refuses to discuss his deep connections to the companies he would oversee and has repeatedly shown contempt for the Senate’s responsibility to their constituents to properly vet his nomination,” said Nick Surgey, CMD’s director of research. “Families in Michigan and Pennsylvania grappling with unsafe drinking water, communities from California to Florida dealing with damage to our climate, and parents looking for ways to clean up the air their kids breathe all deserve the facts behind whose interests Pruitt really serves.”

After Democratic senators boycotted the EPW Committee vote due to concerns over Pruitt’s conflicts of interests and failure to fulfill open records requests, Republicans resorted to suspending committee rules to advance his nomination. Pruitt is expected to face a full Senate vote next week.

Deep Ties to Fossil Fuel Industry

Over the past 15 years, Pruitt has received nearly $350,000 in campaign contributions from the fossil fuel industry, including Continental Resources, whose CEO served as his 2014 campaign chairman. Pruitt has also raised substantial funds for his two federal PACs — Liberty 2.0 and Oklahoma Strong — from fracking giant Devon Energy and coal company Alliance Resources. In 2014, a New York Times’ investigation found that Devon Energy lobbyists drafted letters for Pruitt to send to the EPA and Department of the Interior under his own name.

Last year, Pruitt orchestrated an effort by Republican state attorneys general to oppose the confirmation of Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court. In March, Pruitt sent an email to supporters of his federal PAC boasting of his efforts to block Garland’s confirmation as well as to “successfully [block] the President’s Clean Power plan, his immigration rule and his attempt at a massive takeover of the waters of the U.S.”

A copy of the complaint filed today can be found here:
www.documentcloud.org/documents/3455661-CMD-Petition.html